projects:welcome
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
projects:welcome [2017/11/14 18:35] jerzydziewierz |
projects:welcome [2017/11/14 18:36] jerzydziewierz |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| * When we are ready to install the end effector, this will be the point to consider the amplitude of noise and dust generation: | * When we are ready to install the end effector, this will be the point to consider the amplitude of noise and dust generation: | ||
| - | ** for a 3D printer head, we can all agree that regular ventilation & noise would make it acceptable | + | * for a 3D printer head, we can all agree that regular ventilation & noise would make it acceptable |
| - | ** for a precision 3D scanner head (actually, one of the original uses of this machine) there would be no noise whatsoever | + | * for a precision 3D scanner head (actually, one of the original uses of this machine) there would be no noise whatsoever |
| - | ** for a general purpose CNC machine: I am afraid that this table is not really suitable for a general-purpose CNC operation. This is because the linear motors will have a very limited force that they can exert. Hence, I believe that with current motors, metal and wood processing would not be feasible. One could think about installing stronger motors, but really, that would cost a lot. In any case, if we decide to do this, the dust would have to be extracted up to a cleanroom standard (possible, but not cheap) and the noise would be a serious consideration. High quality spindles (with controlled runout) actually do not create that much noise, but they cost, cost cost. | + | * for a general purpose CNC machine: I am afraid that this table is not really suitable for a general-purpose CNC operation. This is because the linear motors will have a very limited force that they can exert. Hence, I believe that with current motors, metal and wood processing would not be feasible. One could think about installing stronger motors, but really, that would cost a lot. In any case, if we decide to do this, the dust would have to be extracted up to a cleanroom standard (possible, but not cheap) and the noise would be a serious consideration. High-quality spindles (with controlled runout) actually do not create that much noise, but they cost cost cost. |
| - | ** for a PCB router: This is much more possible to do. It is possible to build a low power dust extractor from base materials ( i actually have all the parts that I can contribute). The noise would be manageable. | + | * for a PCB router: This is much more possible to do. It is possible to build a low power dust extractor from base materials ( i actually have all the parts that I can contribute). The noise would be manageable. |
| ** a spark erosion processor: In such case, there is no dust, no noise, and the end product could be of extremely high quality (injection moulds are often finished with this technique). This method is limited by the available electric power, and in general, very slow. EM interference can be managed by enclosing the working area in a Faraday cage. | ** a spark erosion processor: In such case, there is no dust, no noise, and the end product could be of extremely high quality (injection moulds are often finished with this technique). This method is limited by the available electric power, and in general, very slow. EM interference can be managed by enclosing the working area in a Faraday cage. | ||
projects/welcome.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/05/28 17:25 by emil.carr
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
