User Tools

Site Tools


projects:welcome

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
projects:welcome [2017/11/14 19:40]
jerzydziewierz
projects:welcome [2017/11/14 19:45]
jerzydziewierz
Line 29: Line 29:
 == What is missing: == == What is missing: ==
  
-  * We need to build the servo amplifier and the motion controller for it. +  * We need to build the servo amplifier and the motion controller for it. Budgetary cost ~~200gbp 
-  * We need to build a motion controller for it. *machinekit* has been suggested. As far as I understand, the club has a beaglebone black waiting for such opportunity+  * We need to build a motion controller for it. *machinekit* has been suggested. As far as I understand, the club has a beaglebone black waiting for such opportunity
   * We need to supply an end effector - e.g. 3D printer head or other.   * We need to supply an end effector - e.g. 3D printer head or other.
  
Line 50: Line 50:
  * When we are ready to install the end effector, this will be the point to consider the amplitude of noise and dust generation:  * When we are ready to install the end effector, this will be the point to consider the amplitude of noise and dust generation:
  
- * for a 3D printer head, we can all agree that regular ventilation & noise would make it acceptable+ * for a 3D printer head, we can all agree that regular ventilation & noise would be acceptable. Possibly, keep the window open to prevent accumulation of fumes. Otherwise, the risks are low.
  
- * for a precision 3D scanner head (actually, one of the original uses of this machine) there would be no noise whatsoever+ * for a precision 3D scanner head (actually, one of the original uses of this machine) there would be no noise whatsoever. Budgetary cost ~150gbp
  
- * for a general purpose CNC machine: I am afraid that this table is not really suitable for a general-purpose CNC operation. This is because the linear motors will have a very limited force that they can exert. Hence, I believe that with current motors, metal and wood processing would not be feasible. One could think about installing stronger motors, but really, that would cost a lot. In any case, if we decide to do this, the dust would have to be extracted up to a cleanroom standard (possible, but not cheap) and the noise would be a serious consideration. High-quality spindles (with controlled runout) actually do not create that much noise, but they cost cost cost. + * for a general purpose CNC machine: I am afraid that this table is not really suitable for a general-purpose CNC operation. This is because the linear motors will have a rather limited force that they can exert. Hence, I believe that with current motors, metal and wood processing would not be feasible. One could think about installing stronger motors, but really, that would cost a lot. In any case, if we decide to do this, the dust would have to be extracted up to a cleanroom standard (possible, but not cheap) and the noise would be a serious consideration. High-quality spindles (with controlled runout) actually do not create that much noise, but they cost cost cost. 
  
- * for a PCB router: This is much more possible to do. It is possible to build a low power dust extractor from base materials ( i actually have all the parts that I can contribute). The noise would be manageable.+ * for a PCB router: This is much more possible to do. It is possible to build a low power dust extractor from base materials ( i actually have all the parts that I can contribute). The noise would be manageable. We would need to buy in or make a high-quality spindle; budgetary cost is ~200-500gbp.
  
- * a spark erosion processor: In such case, there is no dust, no noise, and the end product could be of extremely high quality (injection moulds are often finished with this technique). This method is limited by the available electric power, and in general, very slow. EM interference can be managed by enclosing the working area in a Faraday cage.+ * a spark erosion processor: In such case, there is no dust, no noise, and the end product could be of extremely high quality (injection moulds are often finished with this technique). This method is limited by the available electric power, and in general, very slow. EM interference can be managed by enclosing the working area in a Faraday cage. Budgetary cost: Unknown, but no less than 500gbp.
  
  
projects/welcome.txt · Last modified: 2018/05/28 17:25 by emil.carr